Site Editor

Gregory J. Riely, MD, PhD

Advertisement
Advertisement

WCLC 2024: Ivonescimab vs Pembrolizumab in First-Line Treatment of PD-L1–Positive NSCLC

By: Vanessa A. Carter, BS
Posted: Monday, September 16, 2024

Caicun Zhou, MD, PhD, of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, China, and colleagues conducted the HARMONi-2 study to compare PD-1 inhibitors—the investigational ivonescimab vs pembrolizumab—as a first-line therapy for PD-L1–positive, advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary analysis of this study, which supports invonescimab monotherapy as a new first-line treatment option in this patient population, was presented during the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) 2024 World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC; Abstract PL02.04).

“Compared to pembrolizumab, ivonescimab demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival in PD–L1 positive NSCLC,” the investigators concluded.

This phase III study enrolled 398 patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic, PD-L1–positive NSCLC. Participants were randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis to receive 20 mg/kg of ivonescimab (n = 198) or 200 mg of pembrolizumab (n = 200) every 3 weeks. Randomization was stratified by clinical stage, PD-L1 expression, and histology.

Treatment with ivonescimab yielded a significantly longer progression-free survival compared with pembrolizumab (P < .0001). Of note, this benefit appeared to be consistent across subgroups, including those with liver (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.47) and brain (HR = 0.55) metastases.

Overall, treatment-related adverse events were reported more frequently with ivonescimab than with pembrolizumab (20.8% vs 16.1%). However, immune-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher were found to be more common with pembrolizumab vs ivonescimab (8.0% vs 7.1%). One interesting finding was that in patients who had squamous cell carcinoma histology, ivonescimab demonstrated a “very manageable safety profile,” the study authors noted. Treatment-related severe adverse events were observed in less than 20% of both treatment arms.

Disclosure: For full disclosures of the study authors, visit wclc2024.iaslc.org.


By continuing to browse this site you permit us and our partners to place identification cookies on your browser and agree to our use of cookies to identify you for marketing. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more.