Prostate Cancer Coverage from Every Angle
Advertisement
Advertisement

ASCO20: LuPSMA Versus Cabazitaxel in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

By: Kayci Reyer
Posted: Friday, June 5, 2020

According to findings from the TheraP trial, presented during the ASCO20 Virtual Scientific Program (Abstract 5500), lutetium Lu 177–prostate-specific membrane antigen–617 (LuPSMA) may result in survival benefits for patients whose metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressed after docetaxel treatment. LuPSMA is a radiolabeled small molecule that targets PSMA-expressing tumors.

“In men with docetaxel-treated [metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer], LuPSMA was more active…than cabazitaxel, with relatively fewer [grade 3 or 4 adverse events], and [prostate-specific antigen [PSA] progression-free survival] favoring LuPSMA,” concluded Michael S. Hofman, MBBS, of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, and colleagues.

The phase II trial included 200 men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who were randomly assigned to receive either 6 to 8 GBq of LuPSMA every 6 weeks for up to 6 cycles (n = 99) or 20 mg/m2 of cabazitaxel every 3 weeks for up to 10 cycles (n = 101). A total of 17 participants died or withdrew from the study prior to receiving treatment.

Patients who received LuPSMA had the higher PSA response rate by a significant margin (66% vs. 37%). At a median follow-up of 11.3 months, the group treated with LuPSMA also experienced improvement in PSA progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.63; P = .007). Outcomes with LuPSMA remained superior when analyses were limited to include men treated per-protocol alone. Overall survival could not yet be calculated; 57 deaths had occurred at the time of presentation, and none were thought to be related to treatment.

A total of 31 men in the LuPSMA group and 42 men in the cabazitaxel group experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events. One patient who received LuPSMA and three patients who received cabazitaxel discontinued treatment due to toxicity.

Disclosure: The study authors reported no conflicts of interest.



By continuing to browse this site you permit us and our partners to place identification cookies on your browser and agree to our use of cookies to identify you for marketing. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more.