Site Editor

William J. Gradishar, MD, FACP, FASCO

Advertisement
Advertisement

Reanalysis of BIG 1-98, SOFT, and TEXT Trials: Focus on Clinical High-Risk Subgroups

By: Celeste L. Dixon
Posted: Thursday, July 7, 2022

Given recent trial results for adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors in treating breast cancer, Meredith M. Regan, FASCO, ScD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, and colleagues decided to reanalyze the results of the BIG 1-98, SOFT, and TEXT trials to estimate early relative and absolute treatment effects of an aromatase inhibitor versus tamoxifen, with ovarian suppression if patients were premenopausal, in clinical high-risk subgroups. More than 500 patients with hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative disease and additional high-risk characteristics (≥ four positive lymph nodes or one to three positive lymph nodes with grade 3, primary tumor ≥ 5 cm, and/or Ki67 index ≥ 20%) participated in each trial. The team presented its findings at the 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting (Abstract 508).

The reanalysis revealed that in these high-risk subgroups, 5 years of aromatase inhibitor therapy versus tamoxifen therapy had a similar magnitude of early treatment effects after 2 to 3 years of follow-up for all patients versus treatment effects observed after a median follow-up in the monarchE trial of 27 months (hazard ratio = 0.70; Kaplan-Meier differences at 2 years, 2.7%; at 3 years, 5.4%; n = 5,637). Specifically, of the 695, 707, and 526 high-risk patients in the BIG 1-98, TEXT, and SOFT trials, 202, 122, and 142 disease-free survival events were observed, respectively, with 5 years of postrandomization.

“Relative and absolute treatment effects sometimes diminished when estimated over 5 years rather than over 2 years, but meaningful absolute differences remained at 5 years in contrast to the Penelope-B trial results,” noted Dr. Regan and co-investigators. “Design and interpretation of high-risk [hormone receptor–]positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer trials may depend on the timing of randomization and selection of backbone adjuvant treatments…, [and] follow-up [of more than] 5 years must remain standard.”

Disclosure: For full disclosures of the study authors, visit coi.asco.org.


By continuing to browse this site you permit us and our partners to place identification cookies on your browser and agree to our use of cookies to identify you for marketing. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more.