Site Editors

Alexander Drilon, MD

Gregory J. Riely, MD, PhD

Advertisement
Advertisement

Is Pan-TRK Immunohistochemistry the Optimal Way to Identify NTRK Gene Fusions in Brain Tumors?

By: Vanessa A. Carter, BS
Posted: Monday, April 25, 2022

Maher Kurdi, MD, of King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh, Saudi Arabia, and colleagues aimed to evaluate whether pan-TRK immunohistochemistry is an efficient and reliable marker for the detection of NTRK fusions in brain tumors. Unfortunately, pan-TRK was not identified as a viable tissue-efficient biomarker for these gene fusions in central nervous system tumors, and these results suggest that next-generation sequencing may have higher specificity over detecting these gene fusions. These findings were published in Pathology and Oncology Research.

“RNA-based next-generation sequencing should be used as an alternative method to detect NTRK fusions,” concluded the study authors. “TruSightOnco500 is a wide-genomic platform that can replace immunohistochemistry and other molecular techniques to screen for DNA and RNA-based mutation using formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue.”

A total of 23 patients diagnosed with pilocytic astrocytoma (n = 8), IDH wild-type glioblastoma (n = 6), IDH-mutant astrocytoma (n = 4), oligodendroglioma, astroblastoma, central neurocytoma, medulloblastoma, and/or liponeurocytoma (n = 1 each) were enrolled. The monoclonal antibody EPR17341 was used to test for pan-TRK immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues. NTRK fusions were identified using DNA- and RNA-based next-generation sequencing.

The mean patient age was 35 years, and the cohort included 16 adults and 7 children. Approximately 47.8% (n = 11) of tumors had detectable pan-TRK expression and were further stratified by diffuse expression (n = 4), focal expression (n = 4), and partial expression (n = 3). Interestingly, only two adult cases (glioblastoma, liponeurocytoma) with pan-TRK expression harbored NTRK fusions; all other cases exhibited no NTRK fusions regardless of pan-TRK expression status.

There was no statistically significant correlation between NTRK fusions and pan-TRK expression, suggesting that pan-TRK expression is not always associated with the presence of these gene alterations. Despite a relatively high sensitivity of immunohistochemistry relative to next-generation sequencing, the ability to detect negative pan-TRK expression was 57.1%. Of note, the overall diagnostic accuracy of pan-TRK in detecting NTRK fusions was 60.9%.

Disclosure: The study authors reported no conflicts of interest.


By continuing to browse this site you permit us and our partners to place identification cookies on your browser and agree to our use of cookies to identify you for marketing. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more.